Intervention to Provide Oppty for Publishers and Creators to Object to Subpoenas Meant to Unmask Identities and Personal Communications
UPDATE 10/15/26 3:50 PM EST: In light of the appearance of thebammap.com’s operator and the compelling motions filed by attorney Leonard French, I have withdrawn my Motion to Intervene without prejudice. I’ve reserved the right to seek relief again if circumstances change, particularly if subpoenas issued under the discovery order seek to identify a publisher, content creator, or other recipient whose reporting I rely on, without providing them notice and a reasonable opportunity to seek the court’s protection. Those could include any of the many high-quality “YouTube content creators, and others” alluded to in ¶ 67 of BAM’s complaint: dozens of LawTubers, collectible and toy YouTubers, Redditors, X posters, and others who meaningfully and lawfully contribute to the public conversation about this interesting subject. I also want to be clear about what I did and didn’t claim. The only right I asserted as my own was my First Amendment right as a reader to receive information.¹ I r...