Posts

Motion Filed to Vacate Speech Restrictions on Reckless Ben

CereBel Legal Intelligence Founder Moves to Intervene in LEGO Retailer Case to Protect Public Access to Gagged YouTube Documentary Motion seeks removal or narrowing of court-ordered speech ban affecting popular YouTube creator Reckless Ben NEW YORK, JUNE 12, 2026 .  AI-startup CereBel Legal Intelligence today announced that its founder filed a motion seeking limited intervention in the wild legal controversy brewing between LEGO reseller Bricks & Minifigs and guerilla journalist Reckless Ben Schneider which has been sensationalized on YouTube and other social media platforms. Ben Schneider, publishing as " Reckless Ben ", appeared poised to release the third installment of a popular three part video series documenting his team's raucous efforts to recover a prized Star Wars LEGO collection— efforts that reseller alleges involved unlawful conduct -- when a Temporary Restraining Order was suddenly served on him by email.  As Schneider explains in a "farewell"...
Post a Comment
Read more

CereBel Files an Amicus Letter Brief in USA v Cohen to Assist Court's Consideration of Sanctions for Miscommunicated Citatons

In a second Southern District of New York matter in which "fake citations" were submitted in support of motions, Generative AI technology has been blamed for the affirming attorneys failure to fully review each cited decision. On this second occasion, former Trump Organization attorney Michael Cohen told the court he used Google Bard before the end of November to research caselaw that would assist his attorney's effort to reduce the length of his supervised release. In early December Google Bard was upgraded with Google's Gemini Pro, making it difficult to reproduce comparable hallucinations. In any case, let this be a reminder that until embedded citation verification tools are more broadly available, attorneys should continue to review and verify accuracy of research conducted with Large Language Models. And refresh knowledge of court rules requiring an understanding of all decisions they choose to cite in pleadings, whther the citations originate in a copy a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Comparing Federal Court Judicial Standing Orders on Artificial Intelligence

Judge / Court Restrictiveness Primary Focus Cert Accuracy Maintan Record Disclose AI Use Tool & Use Other URL Araceli Martínez-Olguín N.D. California Moderate Accuracy ✓ ✓ Link Leslie Kobayashi District of Hawaii Moderate Accuracy, Disclosure ✓ ✓ ✓ Link Derrick Watson, et al. District of Hawaii Moderate Accuracy ✓ Declaration for Unverified Sources, Excludes Basic Research Tools Link Jeffrey Cole N.D. Illinois Moderate Disclosure, Accuracy ✓ ✓ ✓ Certification of Authority Analysis Link Gabriel Fuentes N.D. Illinois Moderate Disclosure ✓ ✓ Link Iain D. Johnston N.D. Illinois Less Compliance Compliance with Federal and Ethical Rules Link Stephen R. Clark E.D. Missouri High Prohibition Prohibition of AI-Drafted Filings for Pro Se Parties Link Evelyn Padin District of New Jersey Moderate Disclosure, Accuracy ✓ ✓ Link Arun Subramanian S.D. New York Moderate Accuracy ✓ Counsel Responsibility for Accuracy, Personal Confirmation Link Michael Newman S.D. Ohio High Prohibition Prohibition of...
1 comment
Read more