Intervention to Provide Oppty for Publishers and Creators to Object to Subpoenas Meant to Unmask Identities and Personal Communications
UPDATE 11/10/26 4:00 PM EST: BAM opposes Anonymous Publisher's motion to quash identifying subpoenas for, among other reasons, "Public interest in BAM generally does not make BAM’s operations manual, vendor relationships, and store-level financial data available to whoever can obtain them and post them on the internet." ECF 31 at 8 (BAM's "involvement in other proceedings or matters that have attracted public attention does not place every aspect of its business in the public domain,” or warrant “an absolute protection of anonymity.") I believed this warranted making the court aware of "the public interest in preserving reporting on consumer affairs and governmental accountability," ECF 33 at 2, and sought leave to file a memorandum on that point, ECF 33-1 . Fortunately the court felt well enough briefed by the parties on the issue and denied leave, finding it “would not be materially assisted.” ECF 44 . Here is a persuasive decision I wo...